Building a new road or highway through a pristine ecosystem is
only the beginning of human-related impacts on the ecosystem. In a short period
of time, the new road or highway induces secondary development, in the form of
additional branch roads, commercial development and human settlement that can
have an even larger impact on ecosystems than the new road or highway alone.
This is a major concern.
This is a major concern.
In page ES-12 of the Executive Summary of the DEIA (Detailed
Environment Impact Assement) for the EKVE (East Klang Valley Expressway), it is
stated:
“The proposed route ………..Based on the potential impact on current landuse and future, the areas involved will lose the status of the current landuse such as forest to highway development.”
“The proposed route ………..Based on the potential impact on current landuse and future, the areas involved will lose the status of the current landuse such as forest to highway development.”
There is a
possibility that the current land use status of the area in and around the Park
traversed by the expressway could change from ‘State Park’ to ‘development’ use
with the construction of EKVE. New townships could appear in and around
the proposed route. This will be a key selling point by
developers…accessibility to highways, etc. That being the case, the gazetted
TWNS area will eventually shrink with rapid urbanization. The prestigious
housing development projects along Guthrie Corridor Expressway are testament to
this. The potential long term negative spinoffs from this project are not
addressed at all in the DEIA.
Page 2-16 of Chapter 2 of the DEIA
increases concerns:
“It conforms to the intended KLORR concept (Outer Ring Road) of which
the alignment is away from MRR2 and caters for future extension of KLORR
(Northern Link)
According
to the Public Works Department Malaysia:
“In
setting out and discussing the potentially significant environmental impacts of
the proposed project, consideration should be given to possible indirect,
cumulative, synergistic or antagonistic environmental effects.”
Contrary
to these guidelines, the DEIA for the EKVE contained no consideration
whatsoever of the
cumulative, indirect or induced impacts of the new highway. It is unreasonable to assume that a new highway through Selangor State Park and other critical wildlife areas would not be followed by further branch roads, commercial development and human settlement along and away from the new highway, if not soon but eventually.
cumulative, indirect or induced impacts of the new highway. It is unreasonable to assume that a new highway through Selangor State Park and other critical wildlife areas would not be followed by further branch roads, commercial development and human settlement along and away from the new highway, if not soon but eventually.
You
can read more on our concerns relating to the EKVE at TrEES website